James Hawthorne Giving up Judgment Empiricism : The Bayesian Epistemology of
نویسندگان
چکیده
Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits was first published in 1948. The view on inductive inference that Russell develops there has received relatively little careful study and, I believe, has been largely misunderstood. Grover Maxwell was one of the few philosophers who understood and carried forward the program of Russell's later work. Maxwell considered Human Knowledge to be one of Russell's most significant works for its treatment of perception, the event ontology, the theory of space-time, the philosophy of mind, and especially for its solution of the mind-body problem. Furthermore, Maxwell wholly agreed with Russell's rejection there of judgment empiricism (the doctrine that all contingent knowledge can be validated on the basis of experience and [noncontingent] logic alone). But with regard to a positive account of inductive inference Maxwell, with his Bayesian version of inductive logic, parted ways with Russell, or so he believed. Of Russell's positive account Maxwell says:
منابع مشابه
James Hawthorne Giving up Judgment Empiricism : The Bayesian Epistemology of Bertrand Russell and Grover Maxwell
Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits was first published in 1948. The view on inductive inference that Russell develops there has received relatively little careful study and, I believe, has been largely misunderstood. Grover Maxwell was one of the few philosophers who understood and carried forward the program of Russell's later work. Maxwell considered Human Knowledge to be one of Russell's ...
متن کاملPragmatism, Inferentialism, and Modality in Sellars’s Arguments against Empiricism
In this essay I want to place the arguments of “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind” into a slightly less local context, by tracing further, into neighboring works, some strands of argumentation that intersect and are woven together in his critique of empiricism in its two principal then-extant forms: traditional, and 20 century logical empiricism. Sellars always accepted that observation rep...
متن کاملThe Position of Myth in Frazer’s Anthropological Theory
George James Frazer (1854-1941), the spiritual father of myth-ritual school, was bred up in the British tradition of empiricism. Believing in the evolutionary process of culture, Frazer mainly focused his attention on explaining such epistemic forms of thought as magic, religion and science. Accordingly, while interpreting the processes through which magic leads to religion and finally evolves ...
متن کاملBayesian Epistemology
Bayesian epistemology addresses epistemological problems with the help of the mathematical theory of probability. It turns out that the probability calculus is especially suited to represent degrees of belief (credences) and to deal with questions of belief change, confirmation, evidence, justification, and coherence. Compared to the informal discussions in traditional epistemology, Bayesian ep...
متن کاملDeliberation, Judgement and the Nature of Evidence §1 Deliberation and Judgement
One kind of deliberation involves an individual reassessing the strengths of her beliefs in the light of new evidence. Bayesian epistemology measures the strength to which one ought to believe a proposition by its probability relative to all available evidence, and thus provides a normative account of individual deliberation. This can be extended to an account of individual judgement by treatin...
متن کامل